13
Aug 09MICHELETTI, ARIAS AND ZELAYA: IN THE MIDDLE OF A PUBLICITY STUNT.
One month ago, as announced by the United States Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, the president of Costa Rica, Óscar Arias Sánchez, was appointed as a mediator in a dialogue between the interim de facto President of Honduras Roberto Micheletti and the deposed Honduran president, removed form the power by what most of the international community considers a coup d’état, Manuel Zelaya. Negotiations were going take place at San José between four delegates representing Micheletti’s interim goverment and a commission sent by Zelaya. Even though, that fisrt round of negotiations didn’t draw an outcome fot the political crisis at Honduras, it did put Costa Rica in the headlines of main news around the globe. But here lies a question: Why choosing such a country and it’s president to lead the agreements between both parts?
First of all, Costa Rica is well known for being a neutral country. Ever since the abolition of the army by Jose Figueres Ferrer in 1948 and consecrated in the Constituion of 1949, Costa Rica, not only has gained a well-known name for becoming the first country around the world to, constitutionally, abolish its army, but for establishing a policy of neutrality among international incidents that includes acts of belligerence.
Óscar Arias’ name appear in this peace equation during his first term as president (1986-1990). It was in that time, that he contributed to solve the political conflicts in Central America which invloved the United States using Honduras as a military base for its armed forces to support a rebel group named the Contras which were fighting against the Sandinista goverment in Nicaragua. The U.S. was also aiding the goverments of El Salvador and Guatemala that, at the time, were enduring left-wind guerrilla attacks. Panama didn’t escape this chaotic political enviroment, as it was facing the military dictatorship of Manuel Antonio Noriega. In the middle of all this, Costa Rica’s name rise as president Arias earned the Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts in the Esquipulas II Agreement which developed a plan in Central America for promoting democracy with free elections and the disbandment of paramilitary forces that receives aid from other groups or countries.
A lot has been said about Arias’ work during the Esquipulas II Agreement. Some opinions favorable, some discouraging. Mostly because some might consider, Arias used his political power to gain a title he didn’t deserved and left unwatch his political duties as president in his own country.
Those in favor of that last opinion, say that more than 20 years later, Arias, running his second term as president, onces again seizes the opportunity to rise his name among the international comunnity, to back up the prize he earned two decades go. In a different enviroment, dealing with goverments that stand behind economical policies, leaving behind ideologies, facing a powerful movement like the one Hugo Chavez, in South America and Nicaragua, is devoloping masked as the A.L.B.A., leaving unwatched a country which isn’t as economically or socially stable as in the mid-eighties, Arias’ new San José Agreement, that deals with a 12-step program to achieve national reconciliation and strengthen democracy in Honduras, has not been as welcomed as he expected, rejected by Zelaya’s Commission and leading the path to failure in giving resolution to the crisis.
Nevertheless, the intention to display a publicity stunt by the mandatary, achieve its goal as he, once again, gained international recognition. At this point in which some say Arias use his political influence and power for his name to achieve this recognition, it is necessary to question those remarks that see these as a negative point for Costa Rica. The repercutions in internal policies for a country that his president delivers most of his efforts to an international event, are not questionable, but the fact that it is not only his name that’s been used fot “publicity” matters, but the country itself, quite says a lot of the way of its internal policies work and way of thinking of the people. A president that stands behind such peace policies, only is representing a country and a population that believe in those policies and that have forged a country that stands for non-belligerence toward other states and furthermore, that promotes a democratic system that doesn’t rely on the power of armed forces displayed by the military. Whether for personal interests or not by Arias, that’s the kind of publicity no other country can afford.